Agentic systems break a goal into steps, select and use tools such as search or document retrieval, evaluate intermediate results, and adjust their approach, rather than producing a single response to a single prompt.

Autonomy exists on a spectrum, from systems that propose a plan for approval to those that execute end to end.

Alternative Names:

AI Agents, Autonomous AI

Why it Matters?

Agentic approaches suit multi-step litigation work such as gathering material across sources, cross-referencing records, and assembling a draft analysis. They also compound risk, since an error early in a chain propagates through every subsequent step and the final output may look coherent while resting on a flawed intermediate conclusion. Reviewable intermediate steps and approval gates before consequential actions are what keep supervision meaningful.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What makes a system agentic rather than just automated?

What makes a system agentic rather than just automated?

Planning and adaptation. An agentic system decides which steps to take and adjusts based on intermediate results, rather than following a fixed sequence.

What is the main risk with agentic workflows?

What is the main risk with agentic workflows?

Error propagation. A mistake at an early step carries through the chain, and the final output can appear coherent while resting on a flawed intermediate conclusion.