AI Incident Reporting

AI Incident Reporting

AI Incident Reporting

Incident reporting captures AI failures including fabricated citations, incorrect extractions that reached work product, confidentiality exposures, and near misses caught before consequence. Reports feed remediation and pattern analysis.

It parallels incident response in other risk domains.

Alternative Names:

AI Incident Response, AI Failure Reporting

Why it Matters?

Without a reporting mechanism a firm learns about AI failures only when they cause visible harm, which forfeits the near misses that would have revealed the pattern earlier. A single fabricated citation caught in review is a data point; the same failure occurring across multiple matters is a system problem requiring different action. Reporting also produces the record demonstrating that the firm monitored its tools, which matters if supervision is later questioned.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What should be reported?

What should be reported?

Fabricated citations, incorrect extractions reaching work product, confidentiality exposures, and near misses caught before they caused harm.

Why capture near misses?

Why capture near misses?

Because they reveal patterns before consequences occur, and a failure recurring across matters is a system problem rather than an isolated error.