AI Standing Order

AI Standing Order

AI Standing Order

AI standing orders are judge-specific rules addressing generative AI. Approaches vary widely: some require disclosure of any AI use, some require certification that all citations were verified by a human, some prohibit AI-drafted filings, and many simply reiterate existing verification duties.

They apply per judge rather than per district, so requirements can differ between courtrooms in the same courthouse.

Alternative Names:

Judicial AI Order, Court AI Standing Order

Why it Matters?

Because these orders are judge-specific and change frequently, compliance is a docketing problem rather than a policy problem. Firms handling matters across many venues need a process for checking each assigned judge's current requirements at case opening, since a certification requirement missed is a compliance failure regardless of whether any AI was used.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Do AI standing orders apply court-wide?

Do AI standing orders apply court-wide?

Usually not. They are typically issued by individual judges, so requirements can differ between judges in the same district and must be checked per assignment.

What do these orders typically require?

What do these orders typically require?

Most commonly a certification that a human verified every citation and quotation, and in some courts disclosure of whether generative AI was used in preparing the filing.