An appeal reviews the proceedings below for error. The appellate court examines the record, briefs, and sometimes oral argument, and does not receive new evidence or reweigh credibility findings.

Review generally requires a final judgment and issues preserved in the trial court.

Alternative Names:

Appellate Review, Taking an Appeal

Why it Matters?

Appeals succeed on preserved legal error rather than on disagreement with the outcome, and the standard of review applied to each issue frequently determines the result before the merits are reached. That is why appellate strategy begins during trial: objections, offers of proof, and post-trial motions build the record that makes review available. Deciding what to appeal is largely a question of which issues carry de novo review.

Frequently asked questions

Can new evidence be presented on appeal?

Can new evidence be presented on appeal?

No. Review is confined to the record made in the trial court, which is why offers of proof matter when evidence is excluded.

What determines whether an appeal is likely to succeed?

What determines whether an appeal is likely to succeed?

Preservation of the issue and the applicable standard of review. Issues reviewed de novo offer far better prospects than discretionary rulings.