The phrase signals that a proposition is assumed only to demonstrate that the argument fails even on that assumption. It preserves the party's contrary position.
It is standard in alternative argument structures.
Alternative Names:
For the Sake of Argument|Assuming Arguendo
Why it Matters?
Alternative arguments assuming arguendo are standard appellate and motion practice, permitting a party to contest an element while demonstrating that the claim fails regardless. Clear signaling matters because an assumption stated without the qualifier may be treated as a concession. Courts have held parties to positions they intended as arguendo where the briefing did not make the conditional nature explicit.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Why does explicit signaling matter?
Where is the construction standard?
