Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Attorney)

Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Attorney)

Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Attorney)

A fiduciary breach claim against an attorney alleges violation of the duties of loyalty, confidentiality, or candor, including undisclosed conflicts, self-dealing, and misuse of client information.

It is distinct from negligence and may support different remedies.

Alternative Names:

Attorney Fiduciary Breach, Lawyer Fiduciary Duty Claim

Why it Matters?

Plaintiffs plead fiduciary breach alongside malpractice because the remedies differ: fee forfeiture and disgorgement do not require proving the underlying case would have succeeded, which avoids the case-within-a-case burden entirely. That makes the characterization consequential. Defense arguments frequently address whether the conduct alleged is genuinely disloyalty or merely negligence relabeled to escape the causation requirement.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Why plead fiduciary breach alongside malpractice?

Why plead fiduciary breach alongside malpractice?

Because fee forfeiture and disgorgement remedies do not require proving the underlying case would have succeeded, avoiding the case-within-a-case burden.

Are the claims duplicative?

Are the claims duplicative?

Courts differ. Some hold fiduciary claims are subsumed by malpractice where the conduct alleged is negligence rather than genuine disloyalty.