The Class Action Fairness Act requires minimal diversity, one hundred or more class members, and more than five million in aggregate controversy. Exceptions return predominantly local controversies to state court.

The unanimity and one-year limits do not apply.

Alternative Names:

Class Action Fairness Act Removal|CAFA Jurisdiction

Why it Matters?

CAFA eliminated the complete diversity and unanimity barriers that kept most class actions in state court, which fundamentally changed class action defense strategy. The local controversy and home state exceptions are the plaintiff's response, requiring that a defined proportion of class members and a significant defendant be forum citizens. Aggregating claims to reach five million is the removing party's burden and is generally satisfiable in any substantial class case.

Frequently Confused with

Frequently asked questions

What barriers did CAFA remove?

What barriers did CAFA remove?

Complete diversity, the unanimity requirement, and the one-year limit, which had kept most class actions in state court.

What is the plaintiff's response?

What is the plaintiff's response?

The local controversy and home state exceptions, requiring defined proportions of forum-citizen class members and defendants.