Clayton Act Section 7

Clayton Act Section 7

Clayton Act Section 7

The provision reaches mergers and acquisitions of stock or assets where the effect may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. The standard is incipiency-based, reaching probable rather than actual harm.

Private plaintiffs may sue as well as agencies.

Alternative Names:

Section 7|Merger Provision

Why it Matters?

Private Section 7 actions by competitors and customers are available alongside agency enforcement and may proceed after a transaction closed, which means clearance by the agencies does not immunize a deal from private challenge. Antitrust injury requirements limit competitor standing, since a rival harmed by a more efficient combined firm suffers no antitrust injury. Divestiture is available as a private remedy.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Does agency clearance immunize a deal?

Does agency clearance immunize a deal?

No. Private plaintiffs may challenge a transaction after closing despite regulatory clearance.

What limits competitor standing?

What limits competitor standing?

Antitrust injury, since a rival harmed by a more efficient combined firm suffers no cognizable injury.