A consent judgment embodies the parties' agreed resolution in a judgment the court enters. It is enforceable through execution and contempt and generally carries preclusive effect on the claims resolved.

In insurance disputes it frequently accompanies a covenant not to execute.

Alternative Names:

Agreed Judgment, Stipulated Judgment

Why it Matters?

The consent judgment plus covenant not to execute plus assignment structure is how a coverage dispute reaches a carrier that denied defense, since the insured stipulates to a judgment it will not have to pay and assigns its claims against the insurer. Several states scrutinize these arrangements for reasonableness and collusion, particularly where the carrier was defending under a reservation of rights and the insured cooperated in an inflated figure.

Frequently asked questions

How is a consent judgment used in coverage disputes?

How is a consent judgment used in coverage disputes?

The insured stipulates to judgment with a covenant not to execute and assigns its claims against the insurer to the plaintiff.

How do courts scrutinize these arrangements?

How do courts scrutinize these arrangements?

For reasonableness and collusion, particularly where the carrier was defending under reservation and the insured agreed to an inflated figure.