Rule 37(e)(1) permits measures no greater than necessary to cure prejudice from lost ESI, including allowing evidence and argument about the loss, precluding certain evidence, or shifting costs.
They are available without any finding of intent.
Alternative Names:
Rule 37(e)(1) Measures, Remedial Measures
Why it Matters?
Curative measures are the realistic exposure in most spoliation disputes, since intent findings are uncommon. The practical effect can still be significant, because permitting the jury to hear evidence and argument about the loss lets a plaintiff suggest what the missing material would have shown without the court making that finding. Cost shifting for additional discovery to reconstruct lost information is another frequent remedy.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What measures are available without intent?
Are curative measures significant?


