Cycle time measures the interval from matter opening to closure, sometimes broken into phases such as time to first evaluation, to mediation, and to disposition.

It is reported as an average or median across a firm or portfolio segment.

Alternative Names:

Time to Resolution, Matter Duration

Why it Matters?

Cycle time correlates strongly with cost, since defense expense accrues with duration, which is why clients weight it heavily. The metric can mislead without adjustment, because a firm that resolves weak cases quickly and tries strong ones will show worse averages than one that settles everything. Segmenting by disposition type is what makes the comparison meaningful, and firms should ask whether their client does so.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Why do clients emphasize cycle time?

Why do clients emphasize cycle time?

Because defense cost accrues with duration, so shorter cycle times generally correlate with lower total spend on comparable matters.

What distorts cycle time comparisons?

What distorts cycle time comparisons?

Case mix and court congestion. Firms handling contested matters or practicing in slow jurisdictions show longer cycles regardless of performance.