Disciplinary Proceeding vs. Malpractice

Disciplinary Proceeding vs. Malpractice

Disciplinary Proceeding vs. Malpractice

Disciplinary proceedings enforce professional conduct rules through licensing authorities and impose sanctions on the license. Malpractice claims are civil actions seeking damages for negligent representation.

A conduct rule violation does not establish civil liability, and conduct rules generally state they are not intended to create a civil cause of action.

Alternative Names:

Discipline and Malpractice, Bar Complaint vs. Civil Claim

Why it Matters?

The independence of the two tracks matters in both directions. A disciplinary finding does not establish malpractice, since the rules expressly disclaim creating civil liability, though plaintiffs frequently attempt to introduce them as evidence of the standard of care. Conversely a malpractice settlement does not resolve a disciplinary complaint. Parallel proceedings also raise practical problems, since statements in one forum are available in the other.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Does a disciplinary finding establish malpractice?

Does a disciplinary finding establish malpractice?

No. Conduct rules generally disclaim creating civil liability, though plaintiffs frequently offer violations as evidence of the standard of care.

Do the proceedings interact?

Do the proceedings interact?

Practically yes. Statements made in one forum are available in the other, which requires coordinating positions across parallel proceedings.