Duty to Defend

Duty to Defend

Duty to Defend

The duty to defend is the insurer's contractual obligation to furnish and fund a defense to its policyholder. It is triggered by the allegations of the complaint measured against the policy language, and it applies whenever any claim in the suit is potentially covered, even if most claims are clearly outside coverage.

Because the standard is potential rather than actual coverage, the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify. An insurer may be required to defend a case for years and ultimately owe nothing on the judgment.

Alternative Names:

Defense Obligation

Why it Matters?

Defense obligations frequently exceed indemnity payments in long-tail complex litigation. Whether the duty attaches determines who controls counsel selection, who directs strategy, and whether defense costs erode the limits available to pay a settlement. Getting the trigger analysis wrong at the outset is one of the most expensive errors in insurance defense.

Frequently asked questions

Is the duty to defend broader than the duty to indemnify?

Is the duty to defend broader than the duty to indemnify?

Yes. The duty to defend arises when claims are potentially covered, while indemnity is owed only for losses actually covered. An insurer can owe a full defense and still owe nothing toward the judgment.

What happens if only one claim in the lawsuit is covered?

What happens if only one claim in the lawsuit is covered?

In most states the insurer must defend the entire lawsuit, including uncovered claims. Some jurisdictions then permit the insurer to seek allocation of defense costs attributable solely to uncovered claims.