Electromyography records electrical activity in muscle, while nerve conduction studies measure the speed and amplitude of nerve signal transmission. Together they identify nerve compression, injury, and the affected level.

Findings can distinguish acute from chronic denervation.

Alternative Names:

Electromyography, Nerve Conduction Study

Why it Matters?

These studies are among the few objective measures in radiculopathy claims, where symptoms are otherwise subjective. A normal study in a claimant reporting radicular symptoms undermines the claim, while a positive study localizing to a specific nerve root corroborates it. The distinction between acute and chronic denervation patterns is also useful, since chronic findings indicate a preexisting process.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What do EMG and nerve conduction studies establish?

What do EMG and nerve conduction studies establish?

Objective evidence of nerve compression or injury and the specific level affected, which corroborates or contradicts reported radicular symptoms.

Can they distinguish old from new injury?

Can they distinguish old from new injury?

To a degree. Acute and chronic denervation produce different patterns, which bears on whether the process predated the incident.