A retained expert's report must contain a complete statement of all opinions and the basis for each, the facts or data considered, any exhibits used to summarize or support the opinions, the expert's qualifications and publications, prior testimony over a defined period, and compensation.

Opinions not disclosed in the report are generally excluded at trial.

Alternative Names:

Rule 26(a)(2)(B) Report, Written Expert Report

Why it Matters?

The report defines the outer boundary of what the expert may say, which makes drafting scope a strategic decision rather than a formality. Opinions omitted are usually lost, while opinions stated too broadly invite Daubert challenge. The facts-or-data-considered requirement is also a discovery lever, since it reaches materials the expert reviewed even if not relied upon.

Frequently asked questions

Can an expert testify to opinions not in the report?

Can an expert testify to opinions not in the report?

Generally no. Undisclosed opinions are usually excluded, though courts sometimes permit elaboration on disclosed opinions in response to cross-examination.

Are draft reports discoverable?

Are draft reports discoverable?

In federal court, drafts and most attorney-expert communications are protected, with exceptions for compensation, facts provided by counsel, and assumptions counsel supplied.