Claims allege inadequate process, conflicts of interest, deal protections precluding superior offers, or failure to maximize value in a change of control. Review ranges from business judgment to entire fairness depending on independence and conflicts.
Disclosure claims are separately common.
Alternative Names:
Deal Fiduciary Claim|M&A Fiduciary Duty Litigation
Why it Matters?
The standard of review determines the outcome, and establishing that a majority-independent board approved the deal on an informed basis after adequate market check preserves business judgment protection. Conflicts involving a controlling stockholder or management participation shift review toward entire fairness, which defendants rarely survive. Documenting the process contemporaneously in board minutes is what supports the record when the claim arrives.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What determines the standard of review?
What supports the defense record?
