Courts have compelled production where the report served business purposes, where the forensic firm had a pre-existing relationship performing similar work, or where the report was distributed broadly within the organization.
The Capital One decision framed the current analysis.
Alternative Names:
Forensic Report Discovery|Breach Report Production
Why it Matters?
Pre-existing vendor relationships are the most damaging fact, since a forensic firm already under contract performing similar services suggests the investigation would have occurred regardless of litigation, which defeats the anticipation requirement. Separate engagement letters, distinct scopes, and counsel-directed reporting address that. Broad internal distribution including to business units and regulators independently undermines protection.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What fact most damages protection?
What else undermines the assertion?
