Inter Partes Review

Inter Partes Review

Inter Partes Review

A petition must be filed within one year of service of an infringement complaint and may raise only anticipation and obviousness based on patents and printed publications. The Board applies a preponderance standard.

Estoppel attaches to grounds raised or reasonably could have been raised.

Alternative Names:

IPR|Inter Partes Review Proceeding

Why it Matters?

Estoppel is the principal cost, since a petitioner is barred from later asserting in district court any ground raised or that reasonably could have been raised, which forecloses prior art strategies not included in the petition. Petition drafting must therefore anticipate the full invalidity case rather than leading with the strongest grounds alone. Discretionary denial practice has also fluctuated, affecting institution likelihood.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What is the principal cost?

What is the principal cost?

Estoppel barring later district court assertion of any ground raised or that reasonably could have been raised.

What does that require of the petition?

What does that require of the petition?

Anticipating the full invalidity case rather than leading only with the strongest grounds.