Power is measured through market share within a defined market, entry conditions, and direct evidence of pricing behavior. It is a lesser showing than monopoly power and is required for most rule of reason claims.

Direct evidence may substitute for share analysis.

Alternative Names:

Antitrust Market Power|Economic Power

Why it Matters?

Market power is a practical prerequisite in rule of reason cases, since a defendant lacking it cannot cause the anticompetitive effects the framework requires, which makes the absence of power a complete defense without reaching the conduct. Direct evidence of the ability to price above competitive levels can substitute for market definition and share analysis, which is the route plaintiffs use when market definition is difficult.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

How does market power differ from monopoly power?

How does market power differ from monopoly power?

It is a lesser showing sufficient for rule of reason claims, while monopoly power requires substantially greater dominance.

Can plaintiffs avoid market definition?

Can plaintiffs avoid market definition?

Through direct evidence of the ability to price above competitive levels, which substitutes for share analysis.