Medical Malpractice

Medical Malpractice

Medical Malpractice

A medical malpractice claim requires proof of a provider-patient relationship, the applicable standard of care, a breach of that standard, causation, and damages. Each element except damages generally requires expert testimony.

The claim is distinguished from an ordinary negligence claim against a healthcare entity, which may not trigger the procedural requirements malpractice statutes impose.

Alternative Names:

Medical Negligence, Healthcare Malpractice

Why it Matters?

Malpractice claims are procedurally distinctive, and defense often begins with the statutory prerequisites rather than the merits: pre-suit notice, affidavits of merit, screening panels, and shortened limitations periods. Many claims are defeated on these grounds before discovery. Whether a claim sounds in malpractice or ordinary negligence is itself frequently litigated, because the characterization determines which requirements apply.

Frequently Confused with

Frequently asked questions

What must a plaintiff prove in a malpractice case?

What must a plaintiff prove in a malpractice case?

A provider-patient relationship, the applicable standard of care, breach of that standard, causation, and damages, with expert testimony required for nearly all of it.

Why does malpractice versus ordinary negligence matter?

Why does malpractice versus ordinary negligence matter?

Because malpractice claims carry procedural prerequisites such as affidavits of merit and shortened limitations periods that ordinary negligence claims do not.