Filing under seal requires court permission because judicial records are presumptively public. Courts weigh the interest in confidentiality against the public right of access, and standards are more demanding for material submitted in connection with dispositive motions.

Many courts require the motion to be narrowly tailored and to propose redaction rather than wholesale sealing.

Alternative Names:

Motion to File Under Seal, Sealing Motion

Why it Matters?

Parties routinely assume that material designated confidential under a protective order may be filed under seal, and courts routinely reject that assumption. The standards differ: a protective order governs exchange between parties, while sealing restricts public access and requires independent justification. Motions that simply invoke the protective order are frequently denied, forcing an unplanned public filing.

Frequently asked questions

Does a protective order permit filing under seal?

Does a protective order permit filing under seal?

No. Sealing requires separate justification because it restricts public access to judicial records, and courts frequently deny motions that rely only on the protective order.

What standard applies to dispositive motion exhibits?

What standard applies to dispositive motion exhibits?

A heightened one. Courts apply a stronger presumption of access to material submitted in connection with summary judgment and other dispositive filings.