Magnetic resonance imaging generates cross-sectional images without ionizing radiation, providing superior soft tissue contrast. It is the study of choice for discs, ligaments, cartilage, and brain tissue.

Contrast agents improve visualization of inflammation and vascular structures.

Alternative Names:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MR Imaging

Why it Matters?

MRI findings drive most spinal injury claims, and the recurring dispute is whether findings are traumatic or degenerative rather than whether they exist. Disc desiccation, endplate changes, and osteophytes indicate chronicity, while acute findings such as marrow edema suggest recent injury. The timing of the study relative to the incident also matters, since imaging obtained months later cannot distinguish acute from developing changes.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What does MRI show that other studies do not?

What does MRI show that other studies do not?

Soft tissue detail including discs, ligaments, cartilage, and brain tissue, which X-ray cannot show and CT shows less clearly.

How are traumatic and degenerative findings distinguished?

How are traumatic and degenerative findings distinguished?

Through characteristics such as disc hydration, endplate changes, and marrow edema, combined with timing relative to the incident and prior comparison studies.