A no-training commitment appears in the data processing agreement or master services agreement and states that customer content will not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise improve models, including by the vendor's subprocessors and underlying model providers.
Strong commitments extend explicitly down the chain to foundation model providers, since that is where the practical risk usually sits.
Alternative Names:
No Training on Customer Data, Training Opt-Out
Why it Matters?
This is the single provision that determines whether confidential client information can be processed by a tool. Enterprise offerings commonly include it while consumer tiers of the same product often do not, which is why tier matters as much as vendor. Firms should confirm the commitment covers subprocessors, since a vendor may not train while its underlying model provider does.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Does a no-training commitment cover the underlying model provider?
Is a privacy policy statement sufficient?
