Nominal Damages (1983)

Nominal Damages (1983)

Nominal Damages (1983)

A plaintiff establishing a violation without provable damages may recover a nominal sum, typically one dollar. Uzuegbunam held that a nominal damages claim prevents mootness and supports prevailing party status.

Fee awards may follow nominal recovery.

Alternative Names:

Nominal Damages|Symbolic Damages

Why it Matters?

Uzuegbunam prevents mooting a case by ceasing the challenged conduct where nominal damages were requested, which forecloses the strategy of voluntary cessation to avoid adjudication and means policy changes made during litigation do not end the case. Nominal recovery also supports prevailing party status for fees, though Farrar counsels that a low award may justify a reduced or zero fee where the litigation achieved little.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What did Uzuegbunam establish?

What did Uzuegbunam establish?

That a nominal damages claim prevents mootness, foreclosing voluntary cessation as a route to avoid adjudication.

Do fees follow nominal recovery?

Do fees follow nominal recovery?

Prevailing party status attaches, though Farrar permits a reduced or zero fee where the litigation achieved little.