Non-Compete in M&A

Non-Compete in M&A

Non-Compete in M&A

Non-competes ancillary to a business sale receive substantially more favorable enforcement than employment non-competes, since the buyer purchased goodwill the covenant protects. Duration and scope must still be reasonable.

Several states permitting sale non-competes prohibit employment ones.

Alternative Names:

Seller Non-Compete|Acquisition Non-Compete

Why it Matters?

The sale-of-business exception survives in states that otherwise prohibit non-competes entirely, including California, which makes the distinction between a seller covenant and an employment covenant consequential for founders who continue working after closing. Structuring the restriction as ancillary to the sale rather than as an employment term is what preserves enforceability. Consideration allocated to the covenant supports that characterization.

Frequently asked questions

Why are sale non-competes more enforceable?

Why are sale non-competes more enforceable?

Because the buyer purchased goodwill the covenant protects, which courts treat differently than employment restrictions.

Does the exception survive in California?

Does the exception survive in California?

Yes. The sale-of-business exception applies even where employment non-competes are void.