Defendants historically offered full relief under Rule 68 to moot the representative's claim. Campbell-Ewald held an unaccepted offer does not moot the claim, and courts have divided on whether actual payment does.

The strategy has largely failed.

Alternative Names:

Pick Off|Mooting the Named Plaintiff

Why it Matters?

Campbell-Ewald foreclosed the unaccepted offer route, and while the Court reserved whether actual tender and entry of judgment would moot the claim, lower courts have largely declined to permit the maneuver, which means the strategy no longer reliably defeats class claims. Relation-back doctrine also preserves the class claim where mooting occurs before a certification decision.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What did Campbell-Ewald establish?

What did Campbell-Ewald establish?

That an unaccepted offer of complete relief does not moot the named plaintiff's claim.

Does actual payment work?

Does actual payment work?

Lower courts have largely declined to permit it, and relation-back preserves the class claim regardless.