Prosecution History Estoppel

Prosecution History Estoppel

Prosecution History Estoppel

Estoppel arises from claim amendments narrowing scope for reasons of patentability and from arguments distinguishing prior art. Festo creates a presumption of complete surrender for the territory between the original and amended claim.

The presumption is rebuttable in limited circumstances.

Alternative Names:

File Wrapper Estoppel|Prosecution Estoppel

Why it Matters?

The Festo presumption places the burden on the patentee to establish that the equivalent was unforeseeable, tangentially related to the amendment, or otherwise beyond reasonable expectation, which is a demanding showing that fails in most cases. Argument-based estoppel operates without any amendment, arising from statements distinguishing prior art, which makes the complete prosecution file essential reading rather than only the amendments.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

What does the Festo presumption require?

What does the Festo presumption require?

The patentee must show the equivalent was unforeseeable or tangential to the amendment, which fails in most cases.

Does estoppel require an amendment?

Does estoppel require an amendment?

No. Argument-based estoppel arises from statements distinguishing prior art without any claim amendment.