Litigation Strategy and Case Evaluation

Portfolio Management

Repeat Player Analysis

Repeat Player Analysis

Repeat Player Analysis

The analysis identifies filing patterns, settlement behavior, trial frequency, expert selections, and case selection criteria of firms appearing repeatedly. Findings inform evaluation and negotiation strategy.

Public docket data supports the analysis.

Alternative Names:

Repeat Player Study|Adversary Analysis

Why it Matters?

Settlement behavior patterns are the most actionable finding, since a firm that consistently resolves before expert discovery presents different dynamics than one that regularly tries cases, and calibrating strategy to that pattern improves outcomes. Expert selection patterns also permit advance preparation, since a firm using the same experts repeatedly makes prior testimony and Daubert rulings available before disclosure.

Frequently asked questions

What is the most actionable finding?

What advance preparation do expert patterns permit?