Rule 23(b)(2) Class

Rule 23(b)(2) Class

Rule 23(b)(2) Class

Rule 23(b)(2) permits certification where the defendant acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, making final injunctive or declaratory relief appropriate for the class as a whole.

It requires neither predominance nor superiority and provides no notice or opt-out rights.

Alternative Names:

Injunctive Class, (b)(2) Class

Why it Matters?

The absence of notice and opt-out rights makes this the preferred vehicle for plaintiffs where it is available, since members are bound without any opportunity to exclude themselves. Dukes limited that path by holding that monetary relief is not available under 23(b)(2) unless incidental to injunctive relief. Challenging a proposed injunctive class that functionally seeks money is a standard and frequently successful defense.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Why do plaintiffs prefer 23(b)(2) certification?

Why do plaintiffs prefer 23(b)(2) certification?

Because it requires no notice or opt-out rights and does not demand predominance or superiority, making certification substantially easier.

Can monetary relief be sought?

Can monetary relief be sought?

Only where incidental to injunctive relief. Dukes held that individualized monetary claims cannot be certified under 23(b)(2).