Saucier mandated deciding whether a constitutional violation occurred before asking whether the right was clearly established. Pearson made the sequence discretionary while permitting courts to follow it.
Sequence choice affects law development.
Alternative Names:
Saucier Protocol|Two-Step Qualified Immunity
Why it Matters?
Courts skipping the merits question and resolving on clearly established grounds avoid creating precedent, which means the law in an area may remain unsettled indefinitely as successive cases are dismissed without any ruling on whether the conduct was unconstitutional. That dynamic favors defendants systematically. Arguing for resolution on the clearly established prong alone is accordingly the standard defense posture.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What did Pearson change?
Why does that favor defendants?
