Section 1988 Fees

Section 1988 Fees

Section 1988 Fees

Prevailing plaintiffs recover fees as a matter of course, while prevailing defendants recover only where the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation. The lodestar method governs calculation.

Nominal damages may support prevailing party status.

Alternative Names:

Civil Rights Attorney Fees|Section 1988

Why it Matters?

The asymmetric standard means defendants rarely recover fees even after complete victory, since frivolousness is a demanding showing that an unsuccessful but colorable claim does not meet. Plaintiff fee exposure frequently exceeds the damages at issue, which shapes settlement economics fundamentally. Offers of judgment can cut off post-offer fees, which is one of the few tools limiting the exposure.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Can prevailing defendants recover fees?

Can prevailing defendants recover fees?

Rarely. Recovery requires showing the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation.

What tool limits plaintiff fee exposure?

What tool limits plaintiff fee exposure?

An offer of judgment, which can cut off fees incurred after the offer where the plaintiff fails to improve on it.