Bar associations have issued opinions addressing competence, confidentiality, supervision, communication, and fees in the context of generative AI. Most conclude that existing rules apply without amendment.
Opinions differ on client consent requirements and billing treatment.
Alternative Names:
Bar Association AI Guidance, Ethics Opinion on AI
Why it Matters?
The consistent conclusion across jurisdictions is that AI use is permissible with appropriate diligence, which resolves the threshold question. The variation is on client consent: some opinions require disclosure before submitting confidential information to an AI tool while others treat it like any vendor relationship. Billing is the other divergence, though the consensus is that a firm cannot bill the pre-technology equivalent for work AI performed faster.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Do bar opinions permit AI use?
Is client consent required?
