Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices

Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices

Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices

State UDAP statutes vary in scope, covered transactions, required intent, and available remedies. Many provide attorney fees, minimum statutory damages, and treble or double damages for willful conduct.

Reliance and causation requirements differ substantially.

Alternative Names:

UDAP|Unfair or Deceptive Practices

Why it Matters?

Variation among state statutes is extreme, with some requiring individualized reliance that defeats class treatment and others permitting classwide proof through a presumption, which makes the state-by-state analysis determinative of certification prospects. Fee shifting sustains claims with modest damages. Safe harbors for conduct authorized by regulators exist in many statutes and are frequently overlooked as a defense.

Frequently Confused with

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

Why does state variation matter so much?

Why does state variation matter so much?

Because reliance requirements determine certification prospects, with some states permitting classwide presumptions and others not.

What defense is frequently overlooked?

What defense is frequently overlooked?

Safe harbors for conduct authorized or regulated by a government agency, which many UDAP statutes include.