In state practice a directed verdict removes an issue or the case from the jury where the evidence is legally insufficient. Federal practice uses the term judgment as a matter of law for the same device.
The standard views evidence favorably to the non-movant.
Alternative Names:
Directed Verdict Motion, State Directed Verdict
Why it Matters?
Terminology differs between systems but the standard is the same, and practitioners moving between them should use the local term to avoid confusion in briefing. State preservation requirements also differ, with some jurisdictions requiring renewal before the case goes to the jury and others treating the initial motion as sufficient. Confirming the local rule before trial is what protects post-verdict options.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
How does a directed verdict differ from judgment as a matter of law?
Why confirm local preservation rules?
