In camera review is examination by the judge outside the presence of the parties and the public. Its principal use is inspecting documents withheld on privilege or confidentiality grounds to determine whether protection applies.

The reviewing court may also conduct in camera proceedings on sensitive matters.

Alternative Names:

In Chambers, Private Judicial Inspection

Why it Matters?

Requesting in camera review is the standard response to a contested privilege log, and it is often preferable to litigating the claim on descriptions alone. The practical constraint is volume: courts will not review thousands of documents, so a request should be limited to a targeted sample or the specific documents genuinely in dispute. Offering a sample is more likely to be granted than demanding wholesale review.

Frequently Confused with

Frequently asked questions

When do courts conduct in camera review?

When do courts conduct in camera review?

Most often to resolve contested privilege claims, examining the withheld documents privately to determine whether the asserted protection applies.

Will a court review an entire production?

Will a court review an entire production?

Rarely. Requests should target specific disputed documents or propose a representative sample, since wholesale review is impractical.