Inventory Settlement

Inventory Settlement

Inventory Settlement

An inventory settlement is negotiated between a defendant and one plaintiff firm covering that firm's entire book of related claims. The parties agree on an aggregate amount or a valuation matrix, and the firm allocates among its clients.

Because plaintiff firms in mass torts hold large concentrated inventories, resolving a handful of firms can dispose of a substantial share of the litigation.

Alternative Names:

Inventory Resolution, Firm Inventory Settlement

Why it Matters?

Inventory deals are the practical route to resolving mass tort exposure without a global settlement, and they let a defendant sequence resolution by starting with the firms holding the strongest or largest books. They also raise a real ethics constraint: aggregate settlement rules require each client's informed consent to the total and to the allocation method, which the plaintiff firm must manage carefully.

Frequently asked questions

How does a plaintiff firm allocate an inventory settlement?

How does a plaintiff firm allocate an inventory settlement?

Usually through a matrix scoring injury severity, exposure, and other criteria, sometimes with a special master or allocation neutral, and always with client consent.

What ethics rules apply?

What ethics rules apply?

Aggregate settlement rules require each client to be informed of the total, the participants, and every claimant's allocation before consenting.