Defenses and Affirmative Defenses

Procedural Defenses

Judicial Estoppel

Judicial Estoppel

Judicial Estoppel

Judicial estoppel prevents a party from taking a position inconsistent with one previously adopted where a court accepted the earlier position. It protects the integrity of judicial proceedings rather than any party's reliance.

The prior position generally must have been accepted.

Alternative Names:

Estoppel Against Inconsistent Positions, Preclusion of Inconsistent Positions

Why it Matters?

Bankruptcy nondisclosure is the most productive application, since a plaintiff who failed to schedule a pending or contemplated claim as an asset while obtaining a discharge has taken a position inconsistent with pursuing it. Courts have applied estoppel to bar such claims entirely. Searching bankruptcy filings for any plaintiff asserting substantial damages is a routine check that occasionally produces a complete defense.

Frequently asked questions

What is the most productive application?

Must the prior position have succeeded?