Motion to Bifurcate

Motion to Bifurcate

Motion to Bifurcate

Rule 42(b) permits separate trials of issues, claims, or third-party claims for convenience, to avoid prejudice, or to expedite. Common divisions include liability and damages, and compensatory and punitive phases.

The Seventh Amendment limits reexamination of decided facts.

Alternative Names:

Bifurcation Motion, Motion for Separate Trial of Issues

Why it Matters?

Bifurcating liability from damages prevents the jury from hearing extensive injury evidence while deciding fault, which is the primary defense benefit in catastrophic injury cases where sympathy may drive the liability finding. Punitive phase bifurcation similarly defers financial condition evidence. The Seventh Amendment constraint requires that the divided issues be genuinely separable so a second jury does not reexamine the first's findings.

Frequently Confused with

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary defense benefit?

What is the primary defense benefit?

Preventing the jury from hearing extensive injury evidence while deciding liability, where sympathy may otherwise influence the fault finding.

What constrains bifurcation?

What constrains bifurcation?

The Seventh Amendment, which requires the divided issues be separable so a second jury does not reexamine the first's findings.