Enforceability requires a protectable interest, reasonable duration and geographic scope, and consistency with public policy. Several states void employment non-competes entirely while permitting sale-of-business covenants.

The regulatory landscape continues shifting.

Alternative Names:

Restrictive Covenant (Employment)|Covenant Not to Compete

Why it Matters?

Enforceability varies so sharply that a covenant valid in one state is void in another, which makes multistate workforce covenants a per-state drafting exercise rather than a uniform template. Choice of law clauses selecting a permissive state are frequently disregarded where the employee works in a state voiding non-competes. Layering non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions preserves protection where the non-compete fails.

Frequently asked questions

Do choice of law clauses preserve enforceability?

Do choice of law clauses preserve enforceability?

Frequently not, since courts in states voiding non-competes disregard clauses selecting permissive jurisdictions.

What preserves protection where the covenant fails?

What preserves protection where the covenant fails?

Layered non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions, which survive in many states voiding non-competes.