Successor Liability (M&A)

Successor Liability (M&A)

Successor Liability (M&A)

Exceptions to the general rule against successor liability include express assumption, de facto merger, mere continuation, and fraudulent transfer. Product line and continuity of enterprise theories extend liability further in some states.

Environmental and employment liabilities frequently transfer by statute.

Alternative Names:

M&A Successor Liability|Acquirer Liability

Why it Matters?

Structuring as an asset purchase does not defeat these doctrines, and the product line exception in particular imposes liability on an acquirer that continued making the same products regardless of how the deal was papered. Diligence into the target's product history, environmental sites, and employment obligations is what quantifies the exposure the structure will not avoid. Insurance and indemnity from the seller become the practical protection.

Frequently asked questions

Does an asset purchase avoid successor liability?

Does an asset purchase avoid successor liability?

Not reliably. Product line, de facto merger, and mere continuation doctrines impose liability regardless of the transaction structure.

What is the practical protection?

What is the practical protection?

Diligence quantifying the exposure, plus seller indemnity and insurance, since the structure alone will not defeat the doctrines.