Inverse Condemnation

Inverse Condemnation

Inverse Condemnation

The owner initiates the action where government action effected a taking without eminent domain proceedings. Physical invasion, flooding, access impairment, and regulatory deprivation are common bases.

The owner bears the burden of establishing a taking occurred.

Alternative Names:

Inverse Condemnation Claim, Reverse Condemnation

Why it Matters?

Physical invasion cases succeed more readily than regulatory ones, since any permanent physical occupation is a taking regardless of the public benefit or the minimal extent. Flooding from public improvements and access impairment from road projects are recurring contexts. Regulatory claims face the demanding Penn Central and Lucas analysis, which most restrictions survive.

Frequently asked questions

Which claims succeed most readily?

Which claims succeed most readily?

Physical invasion, since any permanent physical occupation is a taking regardless of extent or public benefit.

What are recurring contexts?

What are recurring contexts?

Flooding from public improvements and access impairment from road projects, both of which physically affect the property.