Offer of Judgment

Offer of Judgment

Offer of Judgment

Under Federal Rule 68 and state analogs, a party may serve a formal offer to allow judgment on specified terms. If the offer is rejected and the judgment obtained is not more favorable, the offeree must pay costs incurred after the offer.

State versions frequently go further than the federal rule, shifting attorney's fees as well as costs and allowing offers by either party.

Alternative Names:

Rule 68 Offer, Statutory Offer of Settlement

Why it Matters?

In states with robust offer statutes, a well-timed offer changes the economics of a case materially, because the plaintiff faces fee exposure for continuing. The federal rule is weaker, shifting only costs and only against plaintiffs, which limits its practical leverage. Timing matters: an offer made too early lacks credibility, and one made too late shifts fewer costs.

Frequently asked questions

Does Rule 68 shift attorney's fees?

Does Rule 68 shift attorney's fees?

Generally not, unless the underlying statute defines costs to include fees. Many state offer statutes do shift fees, which makes them far more consequential.

Can a plaintiff make an offer of judgment?

Can a plaintiff make an offer of judgment?

Not under the federal rule, which permits only defending parties to serve offers. Many state statutes allow either party to do so.