A summary jury trial presents condensed evidence and argument to a jury drawn from the regular pool, which returns an advisory verdict. The proceeding typically lasts one day and the verdict is not binding.
Jurors may be available for post-verdict discussion.
Alternative Names:
SJT, Mock Trial (Court-Annexed)
Why it Matters?
The post-verdict juror discussion is frequently more valuable than the verdict, because it reveals how ordinary people responded to the evidence, which themes landed, and what they found unconvincing. That information informs both settlement and trial strategy in a way no consultant assessment matches. The procedure is used rarely, largely because it consumes court resources and requires substantial preparation.
Frequently Confused with
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What is the most valuable output?
Why is the procedure uncommon?
